My latest read, Pollution: The Making of Our Chemically Altered Environment by Benjamin Ross and Steven Amter.
It was Rachel Carson who turned the tide. Then, environmental crises at the end of the 1960s drew the attention of the public, and the EPA was created. I graduated from college in 1969 and remember how eagerly a friend's husband joined after law school. It only took a couple years for him to lament the limited purview of this environmental institution and leave government service.
Earth Day was proclaimed April 22, 1970, one day after my son's birth. I would love to say how far we have come, but we haven't. The chemical industry has us in a stranglehold and has no intention of letting go.
But, but, but, people like you and me can change that.
Yesterday I read an article in Salon about how a young writer's fear of having gotten cancer led him to realize the toxic chemical stew we live in may be making us sick.
I got an email this week from Breast Cancer Action, "the first national breast cancer organization to refuse funding from corporations that contribute to or profit from breast cancer so that our work remains uncompromised." BCA works to:
"Eliminate toxins that permeate our everyday lives and increase breast cancer rates.
Build national collaborations with under-served communities to overcome health inequity.
Put patients’ interests before corporate profits through legal and drug approval processes."
Wait. Read those statements again. BCA is targeting toxic chemicals in the environment and putting our interests ahead of corporate profits. We need more organizations like this one. That's where I will be sending a contribution this Earth Day.
I'm waiting for the tipping point, where people catch on, where toxic chemicals will be acknowledged as one cause of cancer, where politicians are brave enough to stand up to corporate interests.
Do you think that day will ever come?
Beverly · 727 weeks ago
Stanley · 727 weeks ago
Then there's the EPA. Your friend was frustrated with their limited purview and quit. Lots of folks are understandably frustrated with their relative lack of efficacy regulating the toxic stew we are to live in. The question, then, is why? Will piles of more cash make them more efficient or effective? (History says no, especially when they are beholden to corporate lobbyists!). Will carbon taxes, which severely limit consumers' economic liberty, magically remove existing "pollutants" from the air?
In light of the unprecedented, unsustainable spending, deficits, and debts we and our grandchildren must now pay, should we really BORROW money from China (which builds a new coal-fired power plant EVERY WEEK - *without* pollution controls) - to cleanse our consciences? Or should we take a different tack and not expect bureaucrats to solve all the issues? Are the solutions to this problem really political?
Personal responsibility is in play here. We all vote every time we spend a dollar. How and where one invests and spends makes the greatest impact on the communities we live in. I'm not convinced that vilifying groups advocating limited government is the way to clean up this mess. Environmentalism is a non-partisan, trans-national issue that has unfortunately been hijacked for political purposes (just ask the founder of Greenpeace!). IMO Politicizing these struggles is extremely counter-productive.
I agree with you : "People like you and me can change that. " It starts with individual choices and setting an example - this is why watching the likes of Al Gore and Laurie David alternate between lecturing the public and flying private jets and living in vast oceanfront estates is so jarring and so corrosive to the cause they champion.
Life = Choices !!
chezsven 82p · 727 weeks ago
Champion of My Heart · 727 weeks ago
My recent post Support Animal Welfare Crusaders in Missouri
Living Large · 727 weeks ago
Heather · 727 weeks ago
My recent post Ukulele Teacher Works Out of Consignment Shop